How about 3 states, rather than 3 capitals?

G GOWTHAM
The debate over the three capitals against amaravati capital is taking an odd turn even as the ysr congress party and the jagan Mohan reddy government are making every effort to prevent the farmers of Amaravati's ongoing padayatra before it approaches the north coastal Andhra districts. In light of this, the amaravati Bahujan Joint Action Committee recently presented the chief minister with a proposal. jac leader P Balakotaiah expressed sadness that the YSRCP leaders have been causing rifts between the farmers of amaravati and the people of north-coastal Andhra in a letter to jagan Mohan Reddy.

He claimed that "you and your party leaders have endeavoured to imply that the amaravati farmers are egotistical individuals who do not want the people of other regions to advance." The farmers in amaravati are allegedly plotting to put pressure on the government to invest lakhs of crores of rupees on their region, denying other regions of development, according to the YSRC leaders, he claimed. "We don't want to delve too much into the subject and reveal the malicious intent behind this effort. But it is fairly clear from the YSRC officials' words that they are dividing the populace in the three regions," the jac leader stated.

He believed that three states, rather than just one, would be preferable if the jagan administration decided to establish three capitals. Through Article 3, the Center is able to combine states to create new states. With 22 MPs in the lok sabha and 10 MPs in the Rajya Sabha, you have a sizable majority in the state assembly. You can use your clout with the Center to establish three distinct states with distinct capitals, he suggested. In place of the three capitals bill, Balakotaiah suggested that jagan present a law for three states, creating distinct states for rayalaseema with four districts, north-coastal Andhra state with three districts, and the remainder of Andhra as central Andhra state.

Find Out More:

Related Articles: