Megastar chiranjeevi has always been a big favourite of mine. Despite never having it myself, I've heard of Chiru's exhilaration in the 1990s. I did watch Gharana Mogudu and Mutha Mesthiri, two of his classic hits, and I liked them. However, by repeating the same chiru style, the directors feel as though they have achieved something. Boss has returned. Masses' boss is back... Vasthe Poonakale, the boss These are the tags that chiranjeevi is receiving. What exactly are his film's filmmakers thinking when they assign him these labels? The enormous label "Megastar" is reserved exclusively for the largest star in the field. Absolutely no other tags should be applied to our cherished Chiru. The directors shouldn't be labelling people with titles like "boss vasthe poonakale."

The audience and we fans will assign pertinent tags to the movie if the directors truly deliver mass content that can induce goosebumps. This forced rubbing by the directors and producers is merely providing social media trolls more content. Why even bother giving chiru these pointless tags? Do they believe that their lungi kattu and beedi smoking antics in the chiru 90s will prove their point? This is the chiru that everyone has already seen in the classic films Muta Mesthri and Gharan Mogudu. Instead, they should concentrate on providing mass-produced material that resonates with contemporary audiences. It is absurd to create routine stuff and call it poonakalu.

The makers have also significantly changed Chiru's appearance. Through VFX and anti-aging technologies, they are attempting to make him appear too flawless and thin. We don't want this from our movie idol. They ought to take notes on how filmmakers portray Mohan Lal and ajith from malayalam and Tamil, respectively. They appear graceful and elegant while acting their age. chiru should be portrayed by our directors in a dignified manner, similar to how he is off camera. The VFX-modified looks, like in the most recent Waltair Veerayya trailer, are quite unnatural. We want Chiranjeevi's directors to produce quality work that also makes chiru relatable to youthful audiences. Instead of meaningless tags that have no purpose, this is what they should be concentrating on.

Numerous chiru admirers throughout the world share this opinion in addition to mine. annayya and his colleagues ought to be aware of our frustration. His directors ought to refrain from this unwelcome Bhajana and continue to produce work of high calibre.