Vijay came to Politics to earn more Money than in Cinema
The connection between Vijay and his father’s campaigning for jayalalitha during her 2011 election bid and his current anti-corruption stance has sparked questions about his consistency on the issue. Jayalalitha, a powerful political figure, was later convicted by the supreme court on corruption charges, a fact that raises doubts about the moral standards of those who openly supported her.
For Vijay, who now champions himself as a voice against corruption, this history seems contradictory. It brings into question whether his current stance is rooted in genuine conviction or if it’s merely a tactic to appeal to his vast fanbase and boost his popularity. The selective nature of his opposition to corruption, when viewed in this light, can come across as opportunistic rather than principled.
Vijay’s large following, primarily driven by his status as a beloved actor, grants him substantial influence over his fans. By positioning himself as a fighter against corruption, he taps into a popular sentiment, resonating with a public frustrated by political scandals and dishonesty. However, when his past political affiliations are taken into account, his stance appears less consistent.
Supporters of Vijay might argue that his views have evolved, but critics see a pattern in which he data-aligns with whatever stance would best serve his public image. This can lead to the impression that he’s leveraging his anti-corruption rhetoric more as a strategic move for personal gain, rather than as a moral commitment. In an industry where fan loyalty translates to revenue, such a stance might be more about brand-building than ethical leadership.
For Vijay, who now champions himself as a voice against corruption, this history seems contradictory. It brings into question whether his current stance is rooted in genuine conviction or if it’s merely a tactic to appeal to his vast fanbase and boost his popularity. The selective nature of his opposition to corruption, when viewed in this light, can come across as opportunistic rather than principled.
Vijay’s large following, primarily driven by his status as a beloved actor, grants him substantial influence over his fans. By positioning himself as a fighter against corruption, he taps into a popular sentiment, resonating with a public frustrated by political scandals and dishonesty. However, when his past political affiliations are taken into account, his stance appears less consistent.
Supporters of Vijay might argue that his views have evolved, but critics see a pattern in which he data-aligns with whatever stance would best serve his public image. This can lead to the impression that he’s leveraging his anti-corruption rhetoric more as a strategic move for personal gain, rather than as a moral commitment. In an industry where fan loyalty translates to revenue, such a stance might be more about brand-building than ethical leadership.