If UCC is Good, then why to keep Tribals out of it? If Bad, then why Impose it?
If the UCC is intended to unify civil laws across religious and cultural groups, excluding specific communities from its ambit suggests a nuanced approach rather than a universal one. This selective application could imply that policymakers recognize the need to respect the distinct practices and customs of tribal groups, yet it raises the question: if the UCC is as beneficial as it is portrayed, why not include everyone?
One reason for this selective approach may be a pragmatic one. Tribal communities in india have unique social structures, laws, and customs that have been respected under the Constitution, granting them a degree of autonomy to preserve their traditions. Imposing a standardized code could potentially disrupt their way of life, which relies on community-based norms rather than the individual-focused framework that a UCC would establish.
Thus, keeping tribes out of UCC implementation suggests an acknowledgment that universal applicability might not be appropriate for all groups, particularly those with deeply rooted indigenous practices. However, this exception also highlights a potential flaw in the concept of "uniformity" if it needs to be applied selectively.