Modi Followers say Sai Pallavi Indirectly Influence Youngsters with Communist Ideologies
Actor sai pallavi, who is infamous for comparing the Kashmiri Pandit genocide to random cow-smuggling events, characterizing Naxalism as a valid "ideology," and equating indian army acts to terrorism, is questioned by many for his role in the film "Amaran." The internet began to circulate some old recordings of sai pallavi revealing her stupidity and wokeness.
In what seems to be a video interview around the time her film virata parvam was released (2022) when asked by the interviewer how she felt about the naxal uniform and guns and if she had any sympathy towards them, she says, “It is an ideology. You might have an ideology but for me, violence is a wrong form of communication. I don’t think now that we can solve this only if we are violent. But at that time, they did not know how to express their problem to them. When there is a law, we have to see what is right and what is wrong. At that time, no one knows where to go. So, they formed a group for themselves, and their mindset is that they will only say what is right and what is wrong. We are not in that situation; it happened long back.”
In the same video, she is seen saying, “People in pakistan think that our army is a terrorist. Because they feel that they are there and they (the army) are harming them. For us, they are terrorists. So the perspective changes. I don’t understand violence. It is very difficult for me to understand it. It is very difficult for us to say what is right and what is wrong. At that time, they believed that justice would come only if we did this. Only if we do this, we can do good to our children and family.”
There is obviously a trend here, starting with shyam Singha Roy's Hindu-bashing and continuing with Virata Parvam's romanticization of the Naxals and that interview. Under the guise of a "character artist," sai pallavi appears to have found her specialty in promoting anti-Hindu, anti-national ideas.
Amaran does not seem to adequately honor the ultimate sacrifice made by Major Mukund Varadarajan and his family, and it appears to once again contain aspects that are blatantly anti-Brahmin and anti-Indian. Even more ridiculous is the fact that sai pallavi, who is unable to distinguish between terrorists and our military, appears in the biography of Major Mukund Varadarajan. Does this seem like a sick joke?
Amaran does not seem to adequately honor the ultimate sacrifice made by Major Mukund Varadarajan and his family, and it appears to once again contain aspects that are blatantly anti-Brahmin and anti-Indian. Even more ridiculous is the fact that sai pallavi, who is unable to distinguish between terrorists and our military, appears in the biography of Major Mukund Varadarajan. Does this seem like a sick joke?
Additionally, she is said to be portraying Ma Sita in a future movie. Will Ma Sita be shown as an awakened lady, or will she in some other manner misrepresent the character and the movie?