Films ‘Blockbuster’, But Multiplexes In Loss?
In contrast to the purported "blockbuster" triumphs of "Singham Again" and "Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3," PVR Inox's stock has dropped by more than 7%, igniting a discussion among investors and fans alike. This disparity baffles a lot of people because, in large part, PVR Inox, its distributor, helped SIngham Again land a 60% share agreement in multiplexes.
Numerous theories have been put out regarding this issue, with some attributing the drop to fabricated success stories and corporate reservations. The public dismisses the success claims as just another marketing gimmick to instill fictitious confidence and artificially increase sales.
Additionally, "Singham Again" is being criticized for restricting BB3's visibility by retaining 60% of the multiplex screens. The makers' designation of these films as "blockbusters" has drawn criticism, with some claiming it is nothing more than a flagrant fabrication intended to deceive the public about the actual potential of these movies.
Additionally, "Singham Again" is being criticized for restricting BB3's visibility by retaining 60% of the multiplex screens. The makers' designation of these films as "blockbusters" has drawn criticism, with some claiming it is nothing more than a flagrant fabrication intended to deceive the public about the actual potential of these movies.
The seeds of distrust are present in social media users' remarks. "All this hype, but PVR's stock keeps tanking," one person said. Do these box office figures even exist? Another said, "Bollywood producers can declare success, but investors seem unconvinced," casting doubt on the producers' moral character. Something doesn't seem right. In order for the public and critics to regain faith in the film industry, this lack of openness must be addressed as quickly as feasible.