Critics Tried to Bury Michael Audiences Just Gave It 94% and Set Their Souls on Fire

SIBY JEYYA
The mask is off, and legacy media is bleeding out in public. Michael Jackson’s biopic *MICHAEL* just landed a scorching 94% Verified audience Score on Rotten Tomatoes — while critics sit at a pitiful 27%, clutching their pearls and muttering about “sanitized” storytelling. 


This isn’t a movie review anymore. It’s open warfare between everyday fans who actually loved the king of Pop and an entitled commentariat that’s spent years trying to torch his legacy. The people have spoken. Loudly. And it’s burning souls in newsrooms across the country.



- Critics’ Score: Hovering in the gutter at ~27-35% — same recycled complaints about the estate’s involvement and “avoiding the tough stuff.”  



- audience Score: A dominant 94% Verified Hot — real people flooding theaters, laughing, crying, and dancing through the magic.




This is the generational rupture we’ve all felt coming. For years, legacy outlets have pushed a one-sided narrative on Michael — allegations, scandals, the works — while conveniently forgetting how many icons had their own demons glossed over in their biopics. Elvis received 77% from critics, despite heavy family input. Now the same rulebook gets thrown out when it’s Michael.



It’s not criticism. It’s coordinated contempt. A forceful, almost personal hatred aimed at tarnishing one of the greatest entertainers who ever lived. But audiences aren’t buying it anymore. They’re showing up, scoring it sky-high, and reminding hollywood that gatekeepers don’t own culture — the people do.



This film’s success won’t just prove the haters wrong. It will expose how disconnected, bitter, and agenda-driven so much of modern “journalism” has become. The battle lines are drawn: General Audiences vs. Legacy Media. And right now, the people are winning — one popcorn bucket at a time. Michael’s light is still shining, and no amount of low Rotten Tomatoes scores can snuff it out. The souls? Already scorched.

Find Out More:

Related Articles: