Employees in andhra pradesh have taken to the streets to protest the government's handling of the PRC issue. As the movement grows in data-size, the common man begins to question whether they are truly fighting for a difference of a few thousand rupees in their pay. When questioned, several startling facts were revealed. It is well known that government personnel used to squander a portion of the funds set aside for welfare initiatives. When it came to disbursing funds to the community, government officials used to eat away at least 10-15 percent of the total allowed funds.
However, with the inauguration of YS jagan Mohan Reddy's administration, assistance initiatives have gone straight into the accounts of beneficiaries, bypassing the use of government personnel as middlemen. The relationship between government personnel and welfare recipients was broken by village secretariats and the volunteer system. people used to form queues in front of public servants at the Taluk, District, and State level offices with their hands folded. However, public officials have lost their status as well as a significant amount of 'additional money.' Many government officials have been disturbed by this, as they work only for the purpose of profiting from corruption. That is why they are abusing jagan Mohan reddy with foul language.
"Employees will not criticize jagan Mohan reddy for the sake of a few thousand rupees. They are concerned about losing millions of dollars due to corruption. They also lost the opportunity to flaunt their dominance in front of the general population. This is the source of the uproar. Other honest and fair employees were inspired to join the protest on behalf of all employees by these corrupted employees. The people of andhra pradesh want the state government to apply ESMA to these government personnel as soon as possible. We don't comprehend why jagan Mohan reddy is spending time like way instead of ordering his employees to keep their tongues shut ", remarked a vijayawada entrepreneur.
"We have no compassion for public servants. They work for public money, receive raises, and their financial lives are secure until they retire. Protesting for a mere cut in their wages is preposterous. Furthermore, if the police and army are not permitted to criticize the government, how can other public bodies be allowed to do so? If they don't like the employment or the income, they can resign and look for any private sector job."