Swiss court blames this family ... exploiting domestic staff!!?
The lawyers representing the defendants said they would appeal.
The court said the four were guilty of exploiting workers and providing unauthorised employment. It dismissed the trafficking charges on the grounds that the staff understood what they were getting into.
The four Hinduja family members were accused of seizing workers' passports, paying them in rupees – not swiss francs — barring them from leaving the villa and forcing them to work excruciatingly long hours for a pittance in switzerland, among other things.
Last week, it emerged in criminal court that the family — which has roots in india — had reached an undisclosed settlement with the plaintiffs. Geneva prosecutors opened the case for alleged illegal activity including exploitation, human trafficking and violation of swiss labour laws
Prosecutors said that at times the staffers — in jobs like cooks or house help — were forced to work up to 18 hours a day with little or no vacation time off and for pay that was equal to less than one-tenth of the comparable amount required under swiss law.
Employees worked even later hours for receptions and slept in the basement of the villa in the upscale Cologny neighbourhood — sometimes on a mattress on the floor, prosecutors said. They described a “climate of fear” instituted by Kamal Hinduja.
Some employees allegedly spoke only hindi and were paid their wages in indian rupees in banks back home that they couldn't access.
A separate tax case brought by swiss authorities is pending against Prakash Hinduja, who obtained swiss citizenship in 2000.
Along with three brothers, he is a leader of an industrial conglomerate in sectors including information technology, media, power, real estate and health care. forbes magazine currently puts the net worth of the Hinduja family at some $20 billion.
“Our clients have been acquitted of all human trafficking charges”, said advocates Yael Hayat, Robert Assael and Roman Jordan, who are representing the Hinduja family in the case.
“We are appalled and disappointed by the rest of the decision made in this court of first instance, and we have of course filed an appeal to the higher court thereby making this part of the judgement not effective. Under swiss law, the presumption of innocence is paramount till a final judgement by the highest adjudicating authority is enforced. Contrary to some media reports, there is no effective detention for any members of the family. It should also be recalled that the plaintiffs in this case had withdrawn their respective complaints after declaring to the court that they had never intended to be involved in such proceedings. The family has full faith in the Judicial Process and remains confident that the truth will prevail”, they added.