Cut & Write! "Why should I tell you?" The judge rejected Tushar Mehta's request! What happened?Chennai: Judge nisha Bhanu flatly rejected the request made by Dushar Mehta on behalf of the enforcement department during the hearing held today in the Senthil balaji recruitment case. He pointedly questioned why I should decide this when I was sure of my decision. A bench of Justices nisha Banu and Bharatha Chakraborty gave two separate verdicts hearing a writ petition filed by his wife Megala challenging the arrest of minister Senthil balaji in the Anti-Money Laundering Act case. Third judge's point: Justice nisha Banu accepted Megala's plea and ordered the release of Senthil Balaji. But Judge Bharata Chakraborty dismissed the recruitment petition and ruled that he should be admitted to the prison hospital within 10 days. Recommended Video "We can't oppose governor who insults DMK"- Ponnaiyan, ADMK The case was transferred to a third judge after a dissenting verdict was given. Justice CV Karthikeyan, who heard the case, said that he accepted the judgment of Justice Bharatha Chakraborty and referred the case back to the Bench of Justices nisha Banu and Bharatha Chakraborty to decide the judicial custody of Senthil Balaji. Rehearing today: With the Chief Justice accepting and approving this, the case came up for hearing before a bench of Justices nisha Banu and Bharata Chakraborty. Senior advocate NR Ilango appeared on behalf of Senthil balaji and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appeared on behalf of the Enforcement Directorate. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who appeared for the enforcement department, said that the third judge had recommended the case to this bench to decide on court custody and Senthil balaji should be allowed to be interrogated. I'm sure: Senior advocate NR Ilango, appearing for Senthil Balaji's wife Megala, sought an adjournment of the case as appeals filed by both sides against the verdict are pending in the supreme Court. Justice nisha Banu then interrupted, saying, I am not going to hear any arguments now. Standing firm in my judgment that the Enforcement Directorate had no jurisdiction to detain Senthil balaji, both sides have now approached the supreme Court. So I don't want to say anything further on this matter. Don't Bharat: Also, Justice nisha Banu said to Judge Bharata Chakraborty, who was in contact with the video, "Bharat... we don't want to keep this case pending. The supreme court will decide on this. Let's not keep this pending any more." At that time, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said that the matter did not need to be discussed. Senthil balaji said the case has been sent back by the third judge only to decide the date of custody of the Enforcement Directorate. What shall I decide?: To which Justice Nishabanu said, I cannot decide the date of detention by the Enforcement Directorate. Why should I decide the date of detention when I say that the enforcement department's arrest is illegal and I stand by my decision to release Senthil Balaji? As he questioned flamboyantly.