Why is DMK working against Karunanidhi's wishes..!?
The bjp has questioned why the DMK is acting against Karunanidhi's wishes. The tamil Nadu government has filed a case in the supreme court alleging that the governor did not approve the bills passed by the Assembly. While this case is pending, the governor of tamil Nadu RN ravi has sent back the 10 Bills to the government of tamil Nadu asking for an explanation. The governor has asked the tamil Nadu government to explain these bills. However, the tamil Nadu government said that the ten bills sent back by the governor will be passed without amendment and will be sent back to him. Speaker Appa has convened a special session of the Legislative assembly for this purpose. In this situation, the bjp has questioned why the DMK is acting against the wishes of late chief minister Karunanidhi. bjp State Vice President Narayanan tirupati said on his X page, "After the governor has sent back the Bills giving the chief minister the power to appoint the Vice Chancellors of the Universities, the tamil Nadu government has decided to convene a special assembly meeting tomorrow and send the resolution back to the Governor.
"On january 5, 1994, the then AIADMK government passed a bill to change the responsibility of the chancellorship of 13 universities in tamil Nadu from that of the governor to the chancellor of those universities. The question in the political circles is who will be the vice-chancellor of the university if the President's rule is implemented in the state? was asked. In the tamil Nadu Legislative assembly, the DMK expressed an opinion that the law was unnecessary," DMK's former president Karunananidhi said. Also, on July 30, 1996, in the tamil Nadu assembly, the then minister of education and DMK's long-time general secretary Prof. Anbazagan withdrew the law brought by the AIADMK and said that the governor would continue to be the chancellor, and if the chief minister was the chancellor, the autonomy of the universities would be questioned and it would hinder the independent functioning of the universities. Also mentioned.
Is it fair to bring a law despite what former DMK leader karunanidhi said was an 'unnecessary law'? Justice? chief minister M.K.Stalin should explain that. Also, if President's rule is implemented in the state, then there will be no chancellor, then who will be chancellor? Are you unconcerned about the future welfare of the students? chief minister Stalin should consider whether it is right to bring this bill again without thinking whether karunanidhi would have heard it if he was there today.
Likewise, is it fair to bring a law against the decision of the then chief minister Karunanidhi's DMK government that the autonomy of the universities will be questioned by chief minister Vendra and will hamper the independent functioning of the universities? Justice? M.K.Stalin must realize that people will ask if this is a government that follows former chief minister Karunanidhi. What is today's DMK government acting against the wishes of the late chief minister M Karunanidhi? The people of tamil Nadu are watching in amazement!” This is what he posted.
"On january 5, 1994, the then AIADMK government passed a bill to change the responsibility of the chancellorship of 13 universities in tamil Nadu from that of the governor to the chancellor of those universities. The question in the political circles is who will be the vice-chancellor of the university if the President's rule is implemented in the state? was asked. In the tamil Nadu Legislative assembly, the DMK expressed an opinion that the law was unnecessary," DMK's former president Karunananidhi said. Also, on July 30, 1996, in the tamil Nadu assembly, the then minister of education and DMK's long-time general secretary Prof. Anbazagan withdrew the law brought by the AIADMK and said that the governor would continue to be the chancellor, and if the chief minister was the chancellor, the autonomy of the universities would be questioned and it would hinder the independent functioning of the universities. Also mentioned.
Is it fair to bring a law despite what former DMK leader karunanidhi said was an 'unnecessary law'? Justice? chief minister M.K.Stalin should explain that. Also, if President's rule is implemented in the state, then there will be no chancellor, then who will be chancellor? Are you unconcerned about the future welfare of the students? chief minister Stalin should consider whether it is right to bring this bill again without thinking whether karunanidhi would have heard it if he was there today.
Likewise, is it fair to bring a law against the decision of the then chief minister Karunanidhi's DMK government that the autonomy of the universities will be questioned by chief minister Vendra and will hamper the independent functioning of the universities? Justice? M.K.Stalin must realize that people will ask if this is a government that follows former chief minister Karunanidhi. What is today's DMK government acting against the wishes of the late chief minister M Karunanidhi? The people of tamil Nadu are watching in amazement!” This is what he posted.