Was Atul called to Jaunpur court from Bengaluru on an average 5 times in a month?
Reportedly before committing suicide, Bengaluru youth Atul Subhash made an 80-minute video explaining in detail the reason for suicide and the people responsible, which went viral after Atul Subhash's death. This video was also seen by a large number of people in Jaunpur, the in-laws' house of Atul Subhash, who lives in Bengaluru. After watching this, especially the lawyers are very angry at the deteriorating condition of the court.
Meanwhile Jaunpur lawyer Surendra vikram singh said, 'The video that Atul Subhash made before committing suicide has listed such flaws in the law that those who study and teach law should know. Even the content of this video should be taught in the training of judges so that new judges are aware that they will not only give justice but they also have to protect the method of giving justice from being corrupted. Because the corrupt way of delivering justice by the court is also largely responsible for Atul Subhash's death.
Moreover Atul Subhash told in his video that he gets only 24 holidays in a year from his Bengaluru office. Whereas he was called separately in 9 cases filed by his wife. In 2 years, he was called on a total of 120 dates, out of which he appeared in 40. That means Atul Subhash had to run to Jaunpur from Bengaluru almost 1.6 times every month. Whereas if the justice system was sensitive, Atul would not have to data-face so much trouble. In Atul Subhash's case, the question also arises that when the facility of online appearance has started in the courts, then why was this facility not given in Atul's case. Whereas in Atul's circumstances, he should have got this facility. In whatever Atul Subhash said in the video before committing suicide, he also named Principal Judge of Jaunpur Family court, rita Kaushik, and held her responsible for his suicide. Lawyers from Jaunpur told ABP news that instead of going into the personal details of Atul's case, the bigger question needs to be addressed as to in what ways the courts themselves are usurping justice.