Brussels: The European Union has fined X €120 million (about $138 million) under its strict new wallet PLATFORM' target='_blank' title='digital-Latest Updates, Photos, Videos are a click away, CLICK NOW">digital rules — the Digital services Act (DSA) — after finding the social media platform in violation of transparency and consumer protection requirements. The punitive action has triggered regulatory pressure on the platform’s blue tick verification system and intensified tensions with the United States.

What the EU Penalised X For

According to the European Commission’s ruling, the fine was imposed for several major breaches of the DSA:

Deceptive design of the blue checkmark — X allowed users to obtain a blue verification badge without meaningful identity verification, which the EU said misleads users about authenticity.

Lack of transparency in advertising data — X failed to provide a clear and usable public ad repository that shows who paid for ads and why users saw particular content.

Restrictions on data access for researchers — The platform imposed unnecessary barriers that prevented independent researchers from accessing its public data.

This €120 million fine — the first formal enforcement decision under the DSA — reflects how seriously the EU now enforces wallet PLATFORM' target='_blank' title='digital-Latest Updates, Photos, Videos are a click away, CLICK NOW">digital transparency and safety rules on large online platforms.

Why the Blue Tick Became a Major Issue

X’s blue tick system was initially transformed into a paid feature that anyone could obtain simply by subscribing, rather than a symbol of verified identity. The EU argued this practice can confuse users, enable impersonation and scam accounts, and undermine trust in platform signalling.

Under the DSA’s provisions for “deceptive design,” platforms must avoid user interdata-faces or features that mislead people about their meaning or intent. The EU concluded X’s blue checkmarks failed to meet this standard.

X’s Response and Planned Changes

In response to the fine, X has submitted remedies to the european Commission aimed at fixing the verification system for users in the EU. This includes restructuring how blue ticks are assigned, more clearly separating paid subscription badges from genuine identity verification marks and adjusting procedures for official institutions and public figures.

The Commission is now reviewing those proposed changes to determine whether they sufficiently bring X into compliance with DSA requirements.

Broader Impact and Regulatory Significance

The EU’s action sets a strong precedent under the wallet PLATFORM' target='_blank' title='digital-Latest Updates, Photos, Videos are a click away, CLICK NOW">digital services Act, a key pillar of european wallet PLATFORM' target='_blank' title='digital-Latest Updates, Photos, Videos are a click away, CLICK NOW">digital regulation designed to ensure user safety, transparency, and accountability from very large online platforms.

Experts note that, besides the one‑time fine, the Commission could impose additional penalties or periodic payments if X fails to act on compliance within specified timeframes. In extreme cases — although not currently confirmed — persistent non‑compliance can even lead to temporary suspension of services under the DSA’s enforcement mechanisms.

Diplomatic and Tech Tensions

The enforcement action has sparked criticism from some U.S. officials, who argue that the EU’s strong regulatory approach unfairly targets American technology companies. High‑level voices in Washington have publicly expressed disapproval of the penalty, claiming it could impact principles like free speech.

Meanwhile, X’s leadership — including its owner — has also criticised the ruling, framing it as heavy‑handed regulatory overreach.

What’s Next for X?

The European Commission will assess X’s remediation plan.

X must implement compliance measures or data-face further enforcement actions.

The dispute highlights how the DSA is reshaping how global platforms operate in european markets.

 

Disclaimer:

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency, organization, employer, or company. All information provided is for general informational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained herein. Readers are advised to verify facts and seek professional advice where necessary. Any reliance placed on such information is strictly at the reader’s own risk.