Project EAT: Leaked Memo Reveals Google’s Ambitious Push to Become an AI Powered Workplace

Balasahana Suresh
Google is reportedly working on an internal initiative codenamed “Project EAT” designed to transform the company into a fully AI‑powered workplace, according to a leaked internal document that has been circulating online.

The leaked memo, first reported by multiple outlets, describes Project EAT as a strategic effort to integrate advanced artificial intelligence tools into Google’s internal workflows — with the aim of dramatically boosting productivity, collaboration, and the quality of work performed by employees.

What is Project EAT?

  • Internal AI initiative: Project EAT — standing for a concept related to “eating your own dogfood” (a tech phrase meaning a company uses and tests its own products internally) — is being led within Google’s AI and Infrastructure (AI2) unit. This division handles key technology foundations such as data centers, custom AI chips, and core infrastructure.
  • Vision for the workplace: The memo outlines a long‑term vision where every employee is “supercharged” with AI tools, including productivity assistants, code support tools, and workflow automations. The goal is to make AI a central part of internal processes — not just in products delivered to customers but in everyday work across engineering, management, and operations.
Early Results and Pilot Programs

According to the leaked internal FAQ referenced in the memo, Project EAT began with a 12‑week “seed stage” focused on AI‑assisted coding tools. Early results reportedly showed faster development cycles, reduced repetitive work (“toil”), and improved code quality, suggesting that AI integration could raise developer productivity significantly.

Project EAT’s proponents say that these AI workflows — if expanded beyond initial pilots — could also lead to better work‑life balance, enhanced employee engagement, and more innovative output across product teams.

Broader Strategic Goals

The initiative is not just about internal tools. The leaked documents suggest that a major objective of Project EAT is to standardize AI technologies across Google, ensuring that both Google‑built and third‑party AI solutions are used consistently and effectively across teams. This could help google maintain its competitiveness in AI — particularly against rivals such as Microsoft, OpenAI, and Amazon, who are also rapidly integrating AI tools into their own operations.

Google executives reportedly view Project EAT as part of a broader organizational reset to keep the company at the forefront of AI adoption — reshaping everything from custom silicon design to everyday software development.

Company Response and industry Reaction

While the leaked memo has circulated widely among tech observers and employees, google has not officially confirmed detailed plans for Project EAT. In discussions with reporters, company representatives have indicated that much of the initiative began as a grassroots effort among internal teams to test and adopt AI capabilities across workflows.

Industry analysts say that such internal AI initiatives are becoming more common as major tech firms seek to harness artificial intelligence not only in customer‑facing products but also inside the workplace — effectively reshaping what modern office work looks like. However, they caution that successful integration at scale requires strong governance, clear training, and safeguards to avoid over‑reliance on automation.

 

Disclaimer:

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency, organization, employer, or company. All information provided is for general informational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained herein. Readers are advised to verify facts and seek professional advice where necessary. Any reliance placed on such information is strictly at the reader’s own risk.

Find Out More:

Related Articles: